Democratic election and consultation tools

[Sam Liddicott]

There are local government elections in my area coming up; the the usual
occasion for candidates to nod to local concerns in a way that will
ultimately fail to distinguish them in any way from eachother.

I spoke with one candidate who sites on the Neighbourhood Management Board
which I chair to discover if he had any intentions of making use of new
technology (or not so new) to engage with constituents and undertake
straw-polls and opinion gathering.

It appears that such things are not supported by local party office but
depend on the efforts and interest of individual candidates. I can only
suppose that the main parties fear obsolescence in the same way that the
music moguls do - when vote opinion may be conveyed rapidly and precisely
to able administrators the political parties will be demoted to special
interest groups lobbying the voters instead of the other way around.

However the candidate expressed an interest in such public consultation
tools as might be made available if the expertise could be provided.

After some thought, though, it is hard to imagine something more useful or
usable than a facebook-poll which allows simultaneously the voting on
propositions and gathering of opinions - but of course only for those who
use facebook.

I therefore think it was to consult here and ask what systems for
collaboration and engagement are known to readers of this mailing list, and
what experience (if any) do readers have with such systems.

Presently it is all too easy for elected representatives to not quite be
able to do things they were planning on not doing, and doing with glory
that which was already planned. Such tools as may bring like minded
citizens together to understand their problems better and the strength of
support would help ensure proper representation and accountability.

Comments?

thanks

Sam
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20120228/4a15c2df/attachment.html>

[Torsten Grote]

Post by Sam Liddicott
I therefore think it was to consult here and ask what systems for
collaboration and engagement are known to readers of this mailing list, and
what experience (if any) do readers have with such systems.

What exactly arre the use cases that should be covered?

My first thoughts are:
http://liquidfeedback.org/
http://trac.adhocracy.de/

Torsten
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20120228/af6c2c88/attachment.pgp>

[Sam Liddicott]

Thanks Torsten, those are useful links.

The use cases are: anything that would improve engagement with voters, and
better inform elected representatives - I don't really know what would turn
out to work.

I think that adhocracy would be a good starting point; particularly as it
blends the degrees of participation and encourages personally controlled
participation for those who cannot make a fuller commitment to local groups
but have an interest in the issues their address. Current models of
engagement require a high degree of participation or no participation, and
make consultation with those who can't easily participate a slow and
expensive process.

thanks very much,

Sam

Post by Torsten Grote

Post by Sam Liddicott
I therefore think it was to consult here and ask what systems for
collaboration and engagement are known to readers of this mailing list,

and

Post by Sam Liddicott
what experience (if any) do readers have with such systems.

What exactly arre the use cases that should be covered?
http://liquidfeedback.org/
http://trac.adhocracy.de/
Torsten
_______________________________________________
Discussion mailing list
Discussion at fsfeurope.org
https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20120228/bb3e5bbb/attachment.html>

[Torsten Grote]

Post by Sam Liddicott
The use cases are: anything that would improve engagement with voters, and
better inform elected representatives - I don't really know what would turn
out to work.

Ok then you might also want to have a look at

http://www.markaspot.de/en/
and
http://www.ushahidi.com/

Also interesting this Freedom Of Information Request software
https://github.com/stefanw/froide

Post by Sam Liddicott
Current models of
engagement require a high degree of participation or no participation, and
make consultation with those who can't easily participate a slow and
expensive process.

Liquid Feedback also allows delegations per topic or globally, so people can
already have an influence with almost no participation relying on people who
participate. In case these people misuse their delegations, they can be
removed at any time.

Regards,
Torsten
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20120310/c342b8c2/attachment.pgp>